March 2007 Archives
click above image for some tattoo history
What is going on down there in Texas?
Tommy has outdone Himself. Check out the stickingpoint in order to see the greatest news story ever produced..ever!
Here's an article, like many others that have appeared since the airing of the James Cameron produced "Jesus' Tomb" show. There are numerous problems with the film-making and many questions I have about the science, but there has not been a single article or criticism that seems to truly "reveal" some profound ethical bankruptcy on the part of the film-makers, scientists and professors involved. Frankly, there hasn't been anything brought to light that seems to refute the basic claim of the film-makers.
Even this article only explains a disagreement with the Mary of Magdalene part of the show's claim. The fundamental hypothesis of the film itself seems to trump whether or not Jesus had a wife or kids or created Tom Hanks' DaVinci hair, etc.
I'm sure there's legitimate scientific arguments against these claims but I have yet to see them. Just alot of people saying things like "it's archeological pornography." What does that mean? That it's true but the lighting, recreations, and script is poorly written?
UPDATE: (Read with the voice of Robert Stack)
Here is what I was looking for.
This was always my favorite Dr. Seuss book growing up. Sure I loved all the others as well but there was something about this book that just burrowed deep into my psyche. It may have been the first thing I committed to memory.
...one fish two fish red fish blue fish old fish new fish black fish....
